-
klondikedays
- No Comments
Most of the token uses are centralized, even if these tokens exist on the decentralized blockchain, such as: in a website platform that has not yet been written to say you will use, but in fact they can use DB to make a cool touch points; and, no one will want to take your platform tokens to do The
part of the token’s function, ETH can do. These tokens have no value or are minimal, at best they count as website platform usage fees, this type is usually not speculative, even speculators do not want to buy, unless these investors are fat sheep who have not done their homework, such as: VC platforms, ENS platforms.
most of the token of information on the chain, it is impossible to verify whether the information is true or false, or the unit responsible for the information on the chain is originally trusted third party. If the blockchain says that the Paris Tower fell, did the Paris Tower really fall? You already believe the earthquake information on the website of the weather bureau, will you believe it more if the weather bureau tells you that it is going to put the information on the blockchain? Superfluous, just one more useless token, such information on the chain simply does not make sense, such as: supply chain, energy-related, certificate related applications, ownership on the chain and transfer, advertising profit-sharing (first explain how to stop employing a lot of manpower to brush fake traffic, otherwise what is the point of the chain are fake amount of information? AI?Artificial intelligence is there 100% correct?”)
part of the token does not tell you anything, only tell you they will rise, when can rise how much, on those exchanges, although these token useless to the extreme, but personally admire the Ponzi scheme in all times can have its different appearance.
China’s white paper, has reached the point of not cheating people still can not, investors will say you this write too honest, can not speculate, they do not buy.
These days it is nonsense to say that one blockchain or application has been proven to work across multiple public chains. Ask the core team of a well-known blockchain who wants to cooperate with you to change the consensus agreement or add new op codes. Why don’t you first think about how many labor inspectors the government itself has to perform labor inspections. The only reason why governments and international organizations are acting aggressively is because they are so desperate to collect taxes. But it’s another joke for governments to think they can tax themselves by regulating centralized exchanges – ever heard of over-the-counter trading? How can decentralized withdrawals be regulated? Do you want to investigate all the money transfer records in the world? In the future, every month when the landlord collects the rent, the government will have to worry about whether you are off-exchange trading profits out of the market, and then ask you for proof of source information, which is impossible to implement, it is simply ridiculous. And moreover, government officials in some countries are blockchain users themselves.
Currently, the only people with a clear business model in the blockchain world are those who open exchanges, those who make hard wallets, and those who engage in related media. Beyond that, until high-speed and provably secure sidechain technology is completed (which means that the cross-chain problem may be solved by the way), making it really easy for numerous blockchain tokens to be applied on platforms to reach cross-border services at high speed, the price of tokens is a bubble.
Most investors actually understand the above things deep down, but are reluctant to say it. And most people fucking hate poetry.”
